| 福建紫金山矿田浅成低温热液型矿床成矿 物质来源探讨——H、O、S、Pb同位素地球化学证据 |
| Received:January 16, 2014 Revised:April 10, 2015 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：LIANG QingLing,JIANG SiHong,BAI DaMing,WANG ShaoHuai.2015.Sources of ore-forming materials of epithermal deposits in Zijinshan orefield in Fujian Province: Evidence from H, O, S and Pb isotopes[J].Mineral Deposits,34(3):533~546 |
| Hits: 2671 |
| Download times: 3658 |
| Author Name | Affiliation | E-mail | | LIANG QingLing | No. 606 Exploration Party, Sichuan Metallurgical & Geological Exploration Bureau, Chengdu 611730, Sichuan, China | | | JIANG SiHong | MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China | jiangsihong1@163.com | | BAI DaMing | MLR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China | | | WANG ShaoHuai | Zijin College of Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China | |
|
| 基金项目:本文受国土资源部公益性行业科研专项(编号:200911007-1-17)资助 |
|
| 中文摘要:紫金山高硫型浅成低温热液型铜金矿床和悦洋低硫型浅成低温热液型银多金属矿床为紫金山矿田内2个典型矿床。为了确定矿床成矿流体和成矿金属来源,文章系统研究了2个矿床的H、O、S、Pb同位素组成特征。结果显示,在紫金山铜金矿床深部的铜矿脉中,6件石英的δDV-SMOW值为-62.0‰~-58.5‰,δ18OV-SMOW值为12.0‰~14.6‰,δ18OH2O值介于2.4‰~6.5‰;26件金属硫化物的δ34S值介于-13‰~2.9‰,峰值介于-5‰~1‰;16件金属硫化物的206Pb/204Pb值介于17.966~18.785,207Pb/204Pb值介于15.571~15.722,208Pb/204Pb值介于38.127~38.849。在悦洋矿区的矿脉中,1件石英样品的δDV-SMOW值为66.6‰;5件石英样品δ18OV-SMOW值介于10.0‰~13.7‰,δ18OH2O值介于-1.1‰~3.4‰;13件金属硫化物的δ34S值介于-6.8‰~-1.0‰,平均值-4‰;5件金属硫化物的206Pb/204Pb值介于18.405~18.521,207Pb/204Pb值介于15.620~15.685,208Pb/204Pb值介于38.587~38.863。H、O同位素特征显示,紫金山铜金矿床的成矿流体水主要来自岩浆水,混合少量大气降水;悦洋银矿床则以大气降水为主,有少量的岩浆水加入。硫化物的S和Pb同位素特征显示,紫金山铜金矿床的成矿物质主要来源于早白垩世岩浆岩,悦洋银矿床的成矿物质主要来源于围岩及早白垩世岩浆岩。 |
| 中文关键词:地球化学 成矿物质 紫金山铜金矿床 悦洋银多金属矿床 紫金山矿田 福建 |
| |
| Sources of ore-forming materials of epithermal deposits in Zijinshan orefield in Fujian Province: Evidence from H, O, S and Pb isotopes |
|
|
| Abstract:The Zijinshan high sulfidation epithermal Cu-Au deposit and the Yueyang low sulfidation epithermal silver polymetallic deposit are two typical deposits in the Zijinshan orefield of Fujian Province, which is a famous superlarge polymetallic orefield in China. In this paper, the authors systematically studied H, O, S and Pb isotopic compositions of the two deposits in order to define the source of ore fluids and ore-forming metals. The quartz δDV-SMOW, δ18OV-SMOW and δ18OH2O of six samples from the deep copper ore zone in the Zijinshan Cu-Au deposit range from -62.0‰ to -58.5‰, from 12.0‰ to 14.6‰ and from 2.4‰ to 6.5‰, respectively. The δ34S values of 26 samples of sulfides in the deposit vary from -13‰ to 2.9‰ with the peak values ranging from -5‰ to 1‰. The 206Pb/204Pb ratios of 16 samples of copper ore are 17.966~18.785, 207Pb/204Pb ratios are 15.571~15.722, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios are 38.127~38.849, respectively. The δDV-SMOW value of a quartz sample from the Yueyang deposit is 66.6‰, and the δ18OV-SMOW and δ18OH2O values of 5 quartz samples are between -10‰ and 13.7‰ and between -1.1‰ and 3.4‰, respectively. The δ34S values of 13 samples of sulfides vary from -6.8‰ to 1.0‰ with the average value being -4‰. The 206Pb/204Pb ratios of 5 sulfide samples are 18.405~18.521, 207Pb/204Pb ratios are 15.620~15.685, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios are 38.587~38.863, respectively. The hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions indicate that the ore fluid of the Zijinshan Cu-Au deposit was mainly sourced from magmatic water with minor meteoric water, whereas atmospheric water was dominant in the Yueyang deposit, with the mixing of a small amount of magmatic water. Based on the sulfur and lead features, the authors hold that the metals of the Zijinshan deposit were derived from Early Cretaceous magmatic rocks, whereas ore-forming materials of the Yueyang deposit were mainly derived from rocks and Early Cretaceous igneous rocks. |
| keywords:geochemistry metal sources Zijinshan Cu-Au deposit Yueyang Ag polymetallic ore deposit Zijinshan orefield Fujian Province |
| View Full Text View/Add Comment Download reader |
|
|
|
