DOI:
矿床地质:1985,Vol.>>Issue(2):88-96

矿床模拟几种作法的比较及实例
中国地质科学院矿床地质研究所
Some ore deposit modeling methods compared
()
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献

摘要点击次数: 2116   全文下载次数: 1714   点此下载全文
        
Abstract:The ore deposit modeling methods have got increasing utilization in China in recent years. They are characterized by relatively broad train of thought and somewhat different approaches. Taking the vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite deposits in Panxi area as an example, the present paper makes a comparison between several approaches of this method, with a view to investi gating the following problems: 1.The question of whether we take a point(e. g., rock body)or an area (an unit in the squared network)as a cell in the division of prediction cells, and the difference as well as the relationship between these two kinds of divisions. The authors hold the opinion that the adoption of a point(a rock bady) as a cell actually means the appraisement and resource prediction of a known point(a rock body), the advantage of which is that the rock body can be relatively thoroughly investigated and the prediction results serve as reference materials in further geologic work, while the adoption of an area(an unit in the squared network)as a cell means including not only known rock bodies but also discovered rock bodies, which is the real prediction of resource totality in the area but fails to calculate the actual resource totality of each unit, let alone that of each rock body. The results of this prediction can be regarded as the final prospect under the present industrial index for long term plan. 2.Concerning characteristic analysis, R. B. McCammon introduced three methods when be gave lectures in China, and the authors have added three other approaches. Comparison shows that these six means approximately have identical practical effects. Geologists can ohoose them according to actual situation. 3.As regards the quantitative appraisement nlodel, volumetric estimation and Monte Carlo model have been commonly used by previous workers. In our study, the multinomial regression model for resource totality and metallogenic advantageous degree(correlation degree)has been used tentatively which gives rather satisfactory result. With this method, one can obtain data fo resource totality of each cell and can estimate the confidence level an well.
文章编号:    
中图分类号:     
文献标志码:

引用文本:
朱裕生,郭履和,杨本锦,张冬梅,彭富钰.1985.矿床模拟几种作法的比较及实例[J].矿床地质,4(2):88~96
.1985.Some ore deposit modeling methods compared[J].Mineral Deposits4(2):88~96
图/表
您是第244233932位访问者  京ICP备05032737号-5  京公网 安备110102004559
主管单位:中国科学技术协会 主办单位:中国地质学会矿床地质专业委员会 中国地质科学院矿产资源研究所
地  址: 北京市百万庄大街26号 邮编:100037 电话:010-68327284;010-68999546 E-mail: minerald@vip.163.com
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计 
手机扫一扫